Home

Hardcore Reviews

Real-scenario comparison tests of mainstream AI tools, with exclusive data and tables.

Testing DeepSeek-V4-Flash Official Release with Codex: A 30-Question Hardcore Benchmark

Built a pure-standard-library benchmark harness with Codex, then made real API calls to DeepSeek-V4-Flash (0731 official) at 2026-08-02 10:51 to run 30 self-built questions. Result: 30/30 correct, 59/59 coding test cases passed, 30-question cost under 5 fen, ~3s average latency, 84% reasoning tokens. Includes the official 9-benchmark comparison and a price showdown (V4-Flash output ~1/90 of Opus 4.8). A hands-on benchmark with reproducible, auditable raw data, including limitations and known weaknesses.

AI LLM Cost-Performance Showdown: Why Chinese Models Are So Much Cheaper

2026 US-China LLM cost-performance showdown: GPT-5 at $10/$30 vs DeepSeek-V3 at $0.27/$1.10 - an order of magnitude apart. Includes a US-China price comparison table and a customer-service scenario cost table (10M tokens: GPT-5 $140 vs Qwen Flash $0.50). Key takeaway: Chinese models are dramatically cheaper, but selection must weigh compliance risk (DoorDash probe) and capability floor. Representative comparison, not a hands-on benchmark.

AI Image Generation Showdown: How to Pick Among Five Tools

A 2026 side-by-side of Midjourney V8.1, FLUX.2, Ideogram, Dreamina, and GPT Image 2 (DALL-E 3 deprecated, succeeded by GPT Image) across image quality, controllability, price, Chinese-prompt support, and open-source status, with two comparison tables. Verdict: Midjourney for quality, FLUX.2 Dev for local deployment and data privacy, Ideogram for text rendering, Dreamina for Chinese beginners and free entry, GPT Image 2 for app integration. Comparisons based on official docs and public descriptions, not hands-on benchmarking.